REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR
Winnefox Library System
Wednesday, July 27, 2005
In conversations and email correspondence, Winnefox
trustees, Tom Widener,
OMRO/WINNECONNE
NON-RECIPROCAL
PAYMENTS TO OSHKOSH PUBLIC appear on this meeting agenda. He has
LIBRARY requested time for a presentation from the
Omro Library regarding the issue. At our last meeting, you all received an overview of the issues and background that was prepared by me and provided to the Omro and Winneconne library directors and their municipal administrators. It would be worthwhile for you to reacquaint yourself with that document (Exhibit G in last months packet) and perhaps bring it with you. If for some reason you can’t find it, it is available online at: http://www.winnefox.org/trustees/boardreports/2005/052505-May/Exhibits/ExhibitG.htm on the Winnefox website or you can call the office for a copy at 236-5220. Also, I’ve enclosed a recent article from the Omro Herald (Exhibit B) which discusses the issue and the decision by the Omro City Council to discontinue the payments as well as an interesting historical report we found from 1961 about OPL Extension services. Discussion. Action: prerogative of the Board.
INDEPENDENT,
OUTSIDE AUDIT
issue of an outside, independent audit be placed on this agenda as follows: “with Winnefox entering into a new contract with the Oshkosh Library the Board needs to know specifically what monies are exchanged between the two bodies. I will be requesting an independent audit of those activities.” As preparation for this discussion, it would be helpful if you reviewed two documents that spell out the exchange of funds between Winnefox and OPL: a) the Resource Library Agreement and b) the Contractual Services Agreement for 2005 (included in Exhibit C). They are annual agreements and were approved by you in September of 2004. You will be receiving revised versions for renewal at the next meeting in September. Discussion. Action: prerogative of the Board.
Winnefox Library System July
27, 2005 Director’s Report Page
2
JOINT DIRECTOR DECISION – As you can see from Merry’s emails, she
CLARIFICATION RE: CONTRACTUAL has some questions about how the existing
ARRANGEMENT contractual arrangement for the OPL
Director’s
services should continue and what the real intent of the Board’s action was at
the last meeting. At the meeting of the
joint Executive Director Search & Screen Committee, this was discussed and
provide an overview and explanation of the current arrangements for everyone’s clarification at this meeting. I will also try to provide some additional information to address Merry’s concerns and questions. Discussion. Action: unknown.
Other issues that may come before the Board for discussion/action:
DIRECTOR’S
EVALUATION PROCESS
HIRING FREEZE
FREQUENCY OF BOARD
MEETINGS
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR SEARCH & The joint Search & Screen Committee
SCREEN PROCESS UPDATE/ISSUES met (their minutes are in your packet). A
variety of issues were discussed and some of them requiring your discussion and/or action follow:
· SEARCH & SCREEN COMMITTEE CHARGE – the Committee’s recommendation of it’s charge/role/responsibilities is contained in their minutes and should be acted upon by the full Board if you agree with it. Discussion. Action Requested: approve Committee charge as contained in the minutes of that meeting.
·
JOB
DESCRIPTIONS – we have developed and/or revised the position descriptions
for Winnefox Director and Assistant Director which are included in your packets
as Exhibit D. They were developed by
Mark Arend and
Winnefox Library System July
27, 2005 Director’s Report Page
3
· CHALLENGES/OPPORTUNITIES FORMS – we are asking all member library directors (and staff if they so choose) to complete these forms (Exhibit E) to gather feedback on what everyone expects as challenges or opportunities their libraries, libraries in general and/or Winnefox faces during the next 3-5 years. It would be very helpful if you would also take a little time and complete them with any of your ideas. We will be compiling them for the Committee’s next meeting (Aug. 4th) as well as providing them with all the ones we receive.
· RECRUITING PROCESS COST ESTIMATE – at the Committee meeting, the question was asked about whether we should have a spending level for the recruitment process. After some discussion which suggested we should have an estimate to monitor but some reservations about having a limit that could affect the Committee’s ability to recruit an attractive candidate, I will prepare an estimate of key costs we might experience and provide it to you at the meeting. Keep in mind that there are many as yet unknown variables so it is difficult to be anything other than general in the estimates for many of the categories at this time.
·
Meet and Greet
Reception – the Committee charge contained a suggestion for
involvement of other trustees, member library directors and staff as well as
community leaders through a meet and greet reception. This was done in
· COST REIMBURSEMENT FOR PARTICIPATION OF MEMBER LIBRARY DIRECTORS IN INTERVIEW PROCESS – the Librarian Advisory Committees are discussing their selection for a five-member committee of directors to participate in the interview process. In order to make it easier for their participation, we would like to suggest that Winnefox compensate them for mileage and for the services of a substitute librarian during the time they would be absent from the library. We estimate the costs to be about $2,600 or less depending upon who is selected and whether they need substitutes. Discussion. Action Requested: approve reimbursement of member library directors for participation in interview process as described.
WINNEFOX LIBRARY SYSTEM - The audit for Winnefox for 2004
2004 AUDIT is included in your packets as Exhibit F
along with a memo from Rick Bowman,
Business Manager, addressing a few of the issues raised in the audit letters and report. The audit is required by Statute and generally finds us in very good financial condition. Most of the
Winnefox Library System July
27, 2005 Director’s Report Page
4
comments/suggestions have been made in past audits and Rick and I will review them with you briefly. Discussion. Action Requested: accept 2004 Winnefox audit as contained in Exhibit F.
WCTS Grant Program Exhibit
G contains a memo from Mark
describing
a proposal for a new grant program from WCTS undesignated reserve funds as
approved and recommended by the WCTS Executive Committee. Discussion.
Action Requested: approve
proposed grant program as described in Exhibit G.
WALS ANNUAL ASSOCIATES The 2006 WALS Associates Fee
AUTOMATION FEES FOR 2006 proposal (Exhibit H) will be reviewed by the
WALS Executive Committee just prior to this meeting. The Associate fees for 2006 range from a low of $6,143 up to $9,021. The increases are mostly in the range of 0-6% with the average around 3.5% when you factor out Campbellsport as a new Associate in 2006. Over the past several years, we have been gradually reducing the savings to the Associates in the form of lower fees due to:
· A temporary reduction due to the Gates Foundation server grants permitting us to lower the amount we annually budget for a shared capital reserve account;
· An adjustment for WCTS member libraries based upon their financial support of a PC support position within the WALS staff.
But we have always pointed out that the reductions were temporary and would be phased out over time as we are doing. As the Gates grant factor disappears and the need to replenish our Shared Capital Reserve fund for computer/network upgrades and replacement grows, the fees need to gradually rise. Even so, the range for Associates fees in 1998 was $6,600 to $9,100. So the proposed 2006 fees, although higher than last year, are still lower than those paid in 1998. Since the libraries are developing their budgets for 2006, we would like to set these fees now so they know what to budget. If there are any proposed changes as a result of today’s WALS Executive Committee discussion, we will advise you of them at the meeting. Discussion. Action Requested: approve the recommendation for WALS Associates fees as included in Exhibit H.
WPLC OVERDRIVE DIGITAL This matter was deferred until we could
AUDIO BOOK DEMONSTRATION – fulfill a request
to obtain a legal opinion
LEGAL OPINION regarding
legal liability for copyright
violations by users of the service. We have obtained that opinion (included as Exhibit I along with a recent article about the subject of downloadable audio books). We have provided a copy of that opinion to the Wisconsin Public Library Consortium (WPLC) coordinator who is sharing it with Overdrive requesting their review, comment and possible contractual changes. While the WPLC members at the last meeting were interested in this opinion and support requested changes, if possible, in the
Winnefox Library System July
27, 2005 Director’s Report Page
5
contract, most, if not all, are proceeding with
implementation of downloadable audio books from Overdrive. We have also requested comment from the
Division of Libraries, Technology & Community Learning (DLTCL) in
LEGISLATIVE ISSUES Things are very active in the legislature right
now. The Governor will be announcing vetoes shortly but public library system aids and Badgerlink funding should be relatively secure at this point since the budget the legislature provided to him includes his original recommendations for those items.
There are a number of other issues emerging that are of great concern to the library community and we should advise you of them and ask for your support of positions we can communicate on behalf of libraries within Winnefox. There are also two bills (the “Language Bill” and the “Reform Bill” which you have reviewed before) being introduced by DLTCL on behalf of the library community. The newest ones are as follows:
AB483 re: Maintenance of Effort – see Mark’s memo in Exhibit J. There is a great deal of discussion taking place within the library community and we will try to share some of it with you by email if you would like to sample the flavor of the reactions. Over recent years, a number of libraries within Winnefox have been held to the exact MOE amount of funding. I have no doubt, that if that requirement were eliminated, library funding in a number of libraries would fall even further. Discussion. Action Requested: authorize drafting of a letter opposing the elimination of the Maintenance of Effort requirement and submit to appropriate legislators.
SB258 re: “R” Rated Video Circulation to Minors – this is also generating a great deal of discussion within the library community. The position of the library community is to leave this issues as a matter for local libraries to address through local policy. This proposal would prohibit circulation of “R” rated videos to anyone under 18 without the library having affirmative proof that their parents/guardians have authorized that activity. The System Board reaffirmed support for the Library Bill of Rights and its interpretations in 1996 (you can find links to these under the Trustees section of the Winnefox website (www.winnefox.org). Exhibit K contains the Access for Children and Young Adults to Nonprint Materials provision for your information. Discussion. Action Requested: authorize drafting of a letter opposing the SB258 and submit to
Winnefox Library System July
27, 2005 Director’s Report Page
6
appropriate legislators.
RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION – Exhibit L contains a Resolution of
DEANNA BOONE Appreciation for service as a
Winnefox
trustee of Deanna Boone. Deanna recently
resigned her position since she and her family were relocating to
status of the county planning processes that leads to the funding requests for libraries in each of the counties. This is a very active area of System support right now. Discussion. Action Requested: none at this time.
REPORT OF THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR – is included as Exhibit M for your information and questions. Mark and/or I may report briefly on any of the items contained therein.
PERSONNEL MATTERS – see Mark’s report.
MISCELLANEOUS REPORTS –
·
OCLC Members Council Election –
·
At the June meeting of the Collaboration
Workgroup (a group of human service providers from Winnebago county agencies
and non-profits that have been meeting together from several years), John
Nichols was presented with the You Make a Difference Award by the group
for 2005 for “significant accomplishments in demonstrated collaboration in
improving life for
·
Mark and I will be attending the Annual
Meeting of Public Library Systems with DLTCL in
· I also attended the recent meeting of the Council on Library and Network Development
Winnefox Library System July
27, 2005 Director’s Report Page
6
· (COLAND) of which I am a member. The agenda for that meeting is attached as well (Exhibit O). If time permits, I will report briefly on two areas of interest from that meeting.
· Articles – I’ve included an interesting article (Exhibit P) by Peter Drucker, “Defining the Duties of the American CEO” which should be interesting in anticipation of hiring a new executive director.
· Correspondence – I’ve included a nice thank you note from Coloma Public Library for the staff’s help with their Summer Reading Program (Exhibit Q).
NOTE: I think this is a record for exhibits.
Respectfully submitted,
John V. Nichols
Director